Big Endian vs. Little Endian: Understanding Byte Order in Computer Systems

In the world of computer systems, data is stored and transmitted in binary format, consisting of individual units called bytes. These bytes are the fundamental building blocks that make up everything from text documents to images and videos. However, when it comes to organizing these bytes in memory, there are two prevalent approaches: Big Endian and Little Endian. Let's delve deeper into these byte orderings and explore their key differences and implications.

To understand Big Endian and Little Endian, we need to delve into how multi-byte data types are represented in memory. In a computer system, data is stored in chunks of fixed sizes, such as 8, 16, 32, or 64 bits. When a multi-byte value, like a 32-bit integer, is stored in memory, it occupies consecutive bytes.

Big Endian is an approach where the most significant byte (the one with the highest value) is stored first in memory. Conversely, Little Endian follows the opposite convention, with the least significant byte stored first. Let's consider the decimal value 4660, represented in hexadecimal as 0x1234. In memory, Big Endian would store it as:

Byte Order:
 Byte 1 Byte 0
| 0x12 | 0x34 |

Meanwhile, Little Endian would arrange the bytes as:

Byte Order:
 Byte 1 Byte 0
| 0x34 | 0x12 |

The choice between Big Endian and Little Endian has implications for various aspects of computer systems, including CPUs, network protocols, and file formats.

Historically, different computer architectures adopted different byte orderings. The Motorola 68000 and IBM System/370 mainframes followed the Big Endian convention, while Intel x86 processors opted for Little Endian. This divergence led to compatibility challenges when exchanging data between systems using different byte orderings.

Network protocols, such as the Internet Protocol (IP), have defined byte ordering conventions to ensure interoperability. The most significant byte first is referred to as network byte order, which aligns with Big Endian. Therefore, systems that utilize Little Endian must convert between their native byte order and network byte order when transmitting or receiving data over the network.

File formats are another area where byte order matters. For instance, the BMP (bitmap) image format specifies that multi-byte values should be stored in Little Endian order. Therefore, if a Big Endian system wants to read or write BMP files, it needs to perform byte swapping to ensure correct interpretation of the data.

The choice between Big Endian and Little Endian can also impact performance. Little Endian systems may have an advantage when processing certain data types, such as integers, as the least significant byte is available first. This arrangement allows for more efficient bitwise operations and direct memory access. On the other hand, Big Endian can simplify certain algorithms, especially when dealing with fixed-point arithmetic or decimal scaling.

In recent years, the dominance of the x86 architecture, which employs Little Endian, has led to its increased prevalence in the industry. Many modern CPUs, including those based on ARM architecture, also support both byte orderings, allowing for flexibility and compatibility.

Understanding the byte order of a system is crucial for developing software, designing protocols, and ensuring seamless interoperability in the diverse landscape of computer systems.

For programmers, working with different byte orderings requires careful consideration. When writing code, it is important to handle data conversions between Big Endian and Little Endian formats explicitly. Most programming languages provide functions and libraries to handle these conversions efficiently.

When designing network protocols or file formats, it is essential to define and communicate the byte ordering convention explicitly. This ensures that data can be properly interpreted by systems using different byte orderings.

For system architects and hardware designers, the choice of byte ordering can impact the overall system performance and compatibility. Understanding the requirements of the target applications and considering the existing ecosystem can help make informed decisions.

It's worth noting that byte order issues are not limited to CPUs and network protocols. They can also arise when transferring data between different types of systems, such as embedded devices, microcontrollers, and even between different programming languages or platforms.

To summarize, Big Endian and Little Endian represent two different approaches to byte ordering in computer systems. Big Endian stores the most significant byte first, while Little Endian stores the least significant byte first. The choice between these byte orderings has historical, compatibility, performance, and standardization implications. Understanding the byte order of a system is crucial for developing software, designing protocols, and ensuring seamless interoperability in the diverse landscape of computer systems. As technology continues to evolve, it is important to stay mindful of byte order issues and consider them in the design and implementation of systems and applications.

One point to note here is compiler and assembler takes care of the bitwise and shifting operations we do in our C/ASM programs. We can detect the difference only when we access row bytes in a 32bit registers. Below program show how to detect endianess from C program.

Big Endian and Little Endian

int cpu_endian(void)
  unsigned int reg = 0x1;
  if ((*(unsigned char *)&reg) == 1) {
    return -1;
  } else {
    return 1;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
  printf("My Processor is %s Endian.\n", cpu_endian() < 0 ? "Little" : "Big");

My Processor is Little Endian.

About our authors: Team EQA

You have viewed 1 page out of 248. Your C learning is 0.00% complete. Login to check your learning progress.

Learn on Youtube